Internet providers in Minneapolis, MN
11 providers report service somewhere in Minneapolis, MN, of which 1 sells fiber. Coverage below is the share of homes in Minneapolis, MN each one reports it can reach, which is why two houses on the same road can have different options.
Every provider serving Minneapolis, MN
| Provider | Technology | Share of Minneapolis homes covered |
|---|---|---|
| Quantum Fiber | Mixed * | 94% |
| Verizon Fios | Mixed * | 80% |
| AT&T Fiber | Mixed * | 76% |
| Fidium Fiber | Mixed * | Under 1% |
| Metronet | Fiber | Under 1% |
| Xfinity | Cable | 100% |
| T-Mobile Home Internet | Fixed Wireless | 80% |
| PCs for People (as filed with the FCC) | Mixed * | 20% |
| EchoStar Corporation (as filed with the FCC) | Satellite | Nationwide |
| Viasat, Inc. (as filed with the FCC) | Satellite | Nationwide |
| Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (as filed with the FCC) | Satellite | Nationwide |
* This operator reports several technologies to the FCC nationally, and the federal data does not break that down by city, so we cannot tell you which one reaches a specific street in Minneapolis. Read the percentage as the whole company, not the brand. A national carrier files its fiber, its cable, its copper and its fixed wireless under one identifier, so a row marked Mixed can be counting a home wireless service even where the brand most people know is a fiber one. We mark a technology plainly only when at least 80% of what that operator reports nationally sits on it, or when its entire filing sits on one technology. Satellite providers are shown last and marked “nationwide” because they cover essentially every address in the country, so their coverage figure tells you nothing about Minneapolis specifically.
Check a specific Minneapolis address →
Or browse every state and city we cover.
Compare two providers in Minneapolis
Both operators in each pair report service here, so these are real choices rather than national matchups:
How Minneapolis compares
Of the 913 places in Minnesota where at least one company reports service, Minneapolis ranks 195 for the number of operators reporting and 165 for the number of those that report any fiber. The typical Minnesota place has 9 reporting and 6 with fiber; Minneapolis has 11 and 8. Nationally that puts it in the best served 7% of places.
More companies is not the same as more choice. An operator counts here if it reports service anywhere in the place, even on one street, so these totals run far above the number of companies that can actually reach a given house. Checked across Ohio, 99% of places have three or more operators reporting some fiber, while the block level study finds 27.9% of US homes with no fiber at all. Both are true and they measure different things. Read the rank as a comparison between places, never as a count of what you can buy, and read the coverage column above for that. A census place can also be a large city or a village of two hundred, so this is a rank among places of every size.
What speeds are available across Minnesota
This is state-level data, not Minneapolis data. The FCC does not publish speed availability below county level, so we will not pretend to have a figure for Minneapolis. Treat the table below as the backdrop for Minnesota as a whole.
| Technology | 25/3 Mbps | 100/20 Mbps | 250/25 Mbps | 1 Gbps / 100 Mbps |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiber | 55% | 55% | 55% | 51% |
| Cable | 77% | 77% | 76% | 33% |
| Fixed wireless | 85% | 61% | 4% | 0% |
| Any technology | 100% | 100% | 100% | 68% |
Share of Minnesota homes where at least one provider reports offering that speed on that technology. See every provider serving Minnesota.
How to read these numbers
A provider at 90% is a realistic option for almost everyone in Minneapolis. A provider at 5% has built out a handful of streets and possibly including yours, possibly not. Neither figure is a promise, because providers report their own coverage to the FCC and the data is known to overstate it.
If a provider tells you they cannot serve your address, they are right and the map is wrong. We would rather say that plainly than pretend to a precision this data does not have.
More on what separates the technologies: fiber vs cable.